Start with evidence
Use the original publication, official documentation, public record, or other primary source where it can answer the question. Identify what the source actually supports and keep the claim within that scope.
A useful reference lets a reader verify the claim without retracing the entire research process. Cite the relevant page and retain the date, geography, definition, and denominator when they affect the meaning of a figure.
Make authorship clear
Every registered guide and blog article has an attributed publishing profile. Profiles group related topics and link to the work in that area. The current Mira Calder, Jonah Reed, and Lena Ortiz profiles are team publishing identities, as their biographies explain.
These identities do not claim personal qualifications, employers, educational credentials, or firsthand experiences. The organization remains accountable for the material it publishes.
Use AI with an evidence trail
DeepSearch is an AI product and its content workflows can use AI assistance for research, organization, and drafting. The presence of polished prose does not establish that a claim is true or that its source says what the draft implies.
Assess the source, numbers, quotations, and product behavior independently of the generated wording. Do not imply firsthand testing or professional credentials that the underlying work does not support.
Keep figures connected to their data
Statistics posts render figures from a typed dataset. The article, Markdown representation, CSV download, and Dataset structured data use that record. Source references explain what a figure measures and the period it covers.
Different populations, collection methods, or time periods can make two percentages incomparable. Keep those distinctions visible and avoid turning a published estimate into a measured product outcome.
Explain commercial context
DeepSearch operates a paid product and an affiliate program. Its own comparisons and product pages are written from that position. They should describe supported features and link to the evidence behind competitor facts.
External ratings belong to the platform that publishes them. We identify the platform, date, and review count when reporting a score. Product examples and internal feedback are not substituted for independent reviews.
Review dates and corrections
An update date should reflect a meaningful change to the content, not simply the time a page was loaded. Product behavior, provider coverage, and prices can change; their current authoritative pages take precedence over older summaries.
To report an error, include the page URL, statement, and supporting evidence. We assess the source and update the relevant content and connected data when a correction is warranted. Privacy and removal requests use their own process.